Who Do You Think You Are? Jason Sudeikis Episode Review

Who Do You Think You Are?

The 11th episode of Season 3 of Who Do You Think You Are? with comedian Jason Sudeikis as the main focus appeared this evening on NBC.  Many of your genealogy blogging colleagues watched this episode and are writing and posting their thoughts.

Here is what fellow genealogists and family historians with their own blogs are saying about WDYTYA:

© 2012, copyright Thomas MacEntee

Print Friendly

This entry was posted in GeneaBloggers and tagged , by Thomas MacEntee. Bookmark the permalink.

About Thomas MacEntee

What happens when a “tech guy” with a love for history gets laid off during The Great Recession of 2008? You get Thomas MacEntee, a genealogy professional who’s also a blogger, educator, author, social media connector, online community builder and more. Thomas was laid off after a 25-year career in the information technology field, so he started his own genealogy-related business called High Definition Genealogy. He also created an online community of over 3,000 family history bloggers known as GeneaBloggers. His most recent endeavor, Hack Genealogy, is an attempt to “re-purpose today’s technology for tomorrow’s genealogy.” Thomas describes himself as a lifelong learner with a background in a multitude of topics who has finally figured out what he does best: teach, inspire, instigate, and serve as a curator and go-to-guy for concept nurturing and inspiration. Thomas is a big believer in success, and that we all succeed when we help each other find success.

One thought on “Who Do You Think You Are? Jason Sudeikis Episode Review

  1. I enjoyed tonight’s episode. However I have some questions…

    I am half-Lithuanian and grew up in Chicago. So when I saw some of the addresses on the death certificate I went to Ancestry.com and started looking at the census. The show brought up Stanley Sudeikis in Bridgeport CT in the 1930 census. However, there is also a Stanley Sudeikis with wife Emma and son Stanley age 14 in Chicago in the 1930 census as well. So I am clueless why they followed the Stanley in CT rather than the Stanley in Chicago??? Any ideas??



Comments are closed.